ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 375 Report and Recommendations, 263 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc., Huaweis objections, 390 are OVERRULED
§ Case No. 2:16-CV-00052-JRG-RSP v. § § T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE U.S.A., §
INC., §
ORDER
Huawei objects to Judge Payne’s recommendation that T-Mobile’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of the ’339 patent under the doctrine of equivalents be granted. Having reviewed the objections, and having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) Huawei’s objections, Dkt. 390, are OVERRULED. (2) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 375, is ADOPTED. (3) T-Mobile’s motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 263, is GRANTED.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 13, 2017).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.