Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 20, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Summary Judgment Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00052, Dkt. No. 414
Decided
September 20, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 361 Report and Recommendations, 256 Sealed Motion, filed by Nokia Solutions and Network US LLC, Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD, §

§ Case No. 2:16-CV-00052-JRG-RSP v. § § T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE U.S.A., §

INC., §

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Payne issued a report recommending that T-Mobile’s motion for partial summary judgment of no pre-suit damages be granted. No objections were filed, and the time to do so has now passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 361, is ADOPTED. (2) T-Mobile’s motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 256, is GRANTED. (3) The damages period for any infringement of the ’339 patent may begin no earlier than the date the complaint was filed, January 15, 2016.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 20, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00052-8
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00052-8

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case