Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00052, Dkt. No. 376
Decided
September 6, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 323 Report and Recommendations, 121 Motion to Dismiss filed by Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD, §

§ Case No. 2:16-CV-00052-JRG-RSP v. § Case No. 2:16-CV-00055-JRG-RSP § Case No. 2:16-CV-00056-JRG-RSP T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE U.S.A., Case No. 2:16-CV-00057-JRG-RSP

§

INC.,

§

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Payne issued a Report and Recommendation, which recommended denying Huawei’s motion to dismiss the counterclaims filed by the T-Mobile defendants. The Report and Recommendation was filed on August 21, 2017, and the parties had until September 5, 2017, to file any objections. No objections were filed, and the time to do so has now passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).

Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (2) Huawei’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.1

Footnotes

  1. 1 Dkt. 121 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00052; Dkt. 115 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00055; Dkt. 119 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00056; Dkt. 114 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00057.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 6, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00052-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00052-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.