Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00052, Dkt. No. 433
Decided
September 28, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 371 Sealed Motion filed by Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, 413 Report and Recommendations, Huaweis objections are OVERRULED
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD, §

§ Case No. 2:16-CV-00052-JRG-RSP v. § Case No. 2:16-CV-00055-JRG-RSP

§ Case No. 2:16-CV-00056-JRG-RSP T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE U.S.A., Case No. 2:16-CV-00057-JRG-RSP

§

INC., §

ORDER

Huawei objects to Judge Payne’s recommendation that Huawei’s motion to dismiss T-Mobile’s counterclaims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction be denied. Having reviewed the objections, and having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) Huawei’s objections are OVERRULED. (2) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (3) Huawei’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED.1

Footnotes

  1. ↩ 1 Dkt. 371 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00052; Dkt. 329 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00055; Dkt. 314 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00056; Dkt. 312 in Case No. 2:16-cv-00057.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00052-11
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00052-11

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case