Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2017)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-00052, Dkt. No. 431
Decided
September 28, 2017
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 379 Report and Recommendations, 262 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. Huaweis objections, 423, are OVERRULED
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD, §

§

v. § Case No. 2:16-CV-00052-JRG-RSP

§

T-MOBILE US, INC., T-MOBILE U.S.A., §

INC. §

ORDER

Huawei objects to Judge Payne’s recommendation that T-Mobile’s motion for summary partial summary judgment of noninfringement be granted. Dkt. 423. Having reviewed the objections, and having considered the Report and Recommendation de novo, the Court finds no reason to reject or modify the recommended disposition. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

Accordingly, It is ORDERED: (1) Huawei’s objections, Dkt. 423, are OVERRULED. (2) The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 379, is ADOPTED. (3) T-Mobile’s motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. 262, is GRANTED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-00052 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 28, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00052-9
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_16-cv-00052-9

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.