Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 415
Decided
April 20, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Memorandum Order 377 and OVERRULES Samsung's Objections 401
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

§

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., § and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS § AMERICA, INC., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC previously filed a Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Samsung’s Damages Expert Dr. M. Ray Perryman Ph.D. (Dkt. No. 182.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 377), granting Headwater’s Motion to Strike only to the extent that Dr. Perryman’s opinions rely on Dr. Foster’s stricken opinions. Samsung has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 401.)

After reviewing the briefing on the Motion to Strike, Judge Payne’s Memorandum Order, and the briefing on Samsung’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Memorandum Order and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Memorandum Order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Samsung’s Objections (Dkt. No. 401) and ADOPTS the Memorandum Order (Dkt. No. 377).

So Ordered this Apr 20, 2025
Figure on page 1 of the opinion

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00103-18
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00103-18

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case