Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2025)

Denied
Summary Judgment Invalidity (§ 102/§ 103)
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 408
Decided
April 20, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 368 and denying 179 Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Based on the Motorola E815
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

§

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP §

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., § and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS § AMERICA, INC., §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Based on the Motorola E815. (Dkt. No. 179.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 368), recommending denial of Headwater’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No.179) is DENIED.

So Ordered this Apr 20, 2025

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00103-12
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00103-12

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case