Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00103, Dkt. No. 410
Decided
April 20, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 364; granting Headwater Research LLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Samsung's Standing Defense 174 and denying Samsung's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing 177
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, §

§

Plaintiff,

§ §

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00103-JRG-RSP

§ §

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

§

and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

§

AMERICA, INC.,

§ §

Defendants.

ORDER

Both parties previously filed motions regarding standing. (Dkt. Nos. 174, 177.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 364), recommending granting Headwater Research LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Samsung’s Standing Defense and recommending denying Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing. Samsung has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 381.)

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motions, the Report and Recommendation, the transcript of the evidentiary hearing on the matter (Dkt. No. 338), and the briefing on Samsung’s Objections (Dkt. No. 381), the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Samsung’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ORDERS that Headwater Research LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Samsung’s Standing Defense (Dkt. No. 174) is GRANTED and Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (Dkt. No. 177) is DENIED.

2So Ordered this Apr 20, 2025

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00103 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00103-13
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00103-13

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.