Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. May 3, 2011)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00333
Decided
May 3, 2011
Judge
Document
Order (scanned)
Docket Entry
STIPULATION and ORDER STAYING CASE until June 8, 2011. The parties shall complete mediation on or before June 7, 2011
Length
5 pages

PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585) pandre@kslaw.com LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404) lkobialka@kslaw.com SEAN BOYLE (State Bar No. 238128) sboyle@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP

333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 O

N Redwood Shores, CA 94065

Telephone: (650) 590-0700 n D Facsimile: (650) 590-1900 N

Attorneys for Plaintiffs S

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC., SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., oO TIONAL

ANALOG DEVICES, INC., FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., NA

TOR CORP., TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, CO.,

SEMICONDUC

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

O AMERICA, UBICOM, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., o LTD., TSMC NORTH

and SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. 10

JAMES C. OTTESON (State Bar No. 157781) 11 jim@agilityiplaw.com

MONICA MUCCHETTI ENO (State Bar No. 164107) 12 monica@agilityiplaw.com

AGILITY IP LAw, LLP 13 1900 University Circle, Suite 201

East Palo Alto, CA 94303 14 Telephone: (650) 227-4800

Facsimile: (650) 318-3483 15

Attorneys for Defendants KERANOS LLC and UNITED MODULE CORPORATION 16

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

SAN JOSE DIVISION

20 OCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC., and Case No.: 10-CV-4241-LHK 21 MICR

SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., and Related Cases: 22

Plaintiffs, Case No.: 10-CV-5290-LHK

Case No.: 10-CV-5196-LHK 23 Vv. Case No.: 11-CV-0430-LHK 24 ULE CORP., and KERANOS, STIPULATION AND PROPOSED}

UNITED MOD

ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF LLC

25

STAY FOR MEDIATION

26 Defendants.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

27

STIP. & [He] ORDER CASE NO. 10-CV-04241-LHK REGARDING EXTENSION OF STAY AND RELATED CASES2 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR Case No.: 10-CV-5290-LHK MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.,

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

ON TSMC NORTH AMERICA, and DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UBICOM, INC.,

Y

W

Plaintiffs,

e F

V.

H

O

UNITED MODULE CORP., and D

H KERANOS, LLC,

Defendants.

N

J e w FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., Case No.: 10-CV-5196-LHK

NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., and o C ANALOG DEVICES, INC., DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiffs,

e te V.

UNITED MODULE CORP., and .nS KERANOS, LLC, © Defendants. i ~

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and Case No.: 11-CV-0430-LHK r C ) SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

© DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL i C ) Plaintiffs, © i M ¥

.h c ©o i LE CORP., and

UNITED MODU

KERANOS, LLC, © ww n n > Defendants. O <

R n n R

K nS WHEREAS Plaintiffs Microchip Technology, Inc.; Silicon Storage Technology, Inc., O ©

K s n

r Manufacturing Co., Ltd., TSMC North America; Ubicom, Inc., Freescale © Taiwan Semiconducto P ©

B a conductor Corp., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung NK S~ Semiconductor, Inc., National Semi ” a ) d NH © Analog Devices, Inc. (herein “Declaratory Judgment Plaintiffs) an Semiconductor, Inc., ) N ©

LLC and United Module Corp. (herein “Declaratory Judgment Defendants) P Defendants Keranos, i o w in court-appointed mediation for the (collectively “Parties”) stipulated and agreed to participate O o N o

resolve the four above-referenced related cases as well as the claims brought purpose of trying to RDER -l- CASE NO. 10-CV-04241-LHK STIP. & ROR] O

Figure on page 3 of the opinion

3lase 2:11-cv-00333-RWS Document 32 Filed 05/03/11

Page 3 of 5 PagelD #:

by and/or against them in Keranos v. Analog Devices, Inc. et al., Civ. Action No. 2:10-cv-207, H District of Texas (Dkt. # 67); K that is pending in the Eastern D

W participate in this mediation before June WHEREAS the Parties stipulated and agreed to

e F

6, 2011 (Dkt. # 67); e N

REAS the Court ordered the Parties to complete mediation on or before June 3, WHE

o D

2011 (Dkt. # 69); N

IN

C EREAS the Court ordered the Parties to file a stipulation of dismissal, or to notify the O WH

O did not settle, on or before June 6, 2011 (Dkt. # 69); o Court that the cases WHEREAS the Court stayed the cases until June 6, 2011 (Dkt. # 69); WHEREAS scheduling the mediation involved coordinating the schedules of the 2

ntatives of more than ten parties, and for that reason the Parties and mediator and represe ) e June 3, 2011; © mediator could not reach a mutually agreed date for the mediation befor

Parties and mediator have agreed to schedule the mediation for June 6, WHEREAS, the

2 > ne 7, 2011 as an additional date if appropriate. © 2011 and to consider Ju

e ©o The Parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE that:

o c he current stay of the above-captioned cases is extended until June 8, 2011; 1. T

udgment Plaintiffs and Declaratory Judgment Defendants agree to oc 2. Declaratory J O O n court-appointed mediation for the purpose of resolving the four above-E participate i L

E

ted cases as well as the claims brought by and/or against them in S referenced rela O ding in O og Devices, Inc. et al., Civ. Action No. 2:10-cv-207, that is pen C Keranos vy. Anal n S ) ©

the Eastern District of Texas;

i C ©

Plaintiffs and Declaratory Judgment Defendants agree to 3. Declaratory Judgment i e participate in this mediation on or before June 7, 2011; and

C o ro [

DER = CASE NO. 10-CV-04241-LHK STIP. & PROBS OR

Figure on page 4 of the opinion

44. Declaratory Judgment Plaintiffs and Declaratory Judgment Defendants agree to file

NW with the Court a stipulation of dismissal, or to notify the Court that the cases did not w W settle, on or before June 8, 2011. -

Dated: May 2, 2011 AGILITY IP LAw, LLP N

N

O

D

By: /s/ Monica Mucchetti Eno Monica Mucchetti Eno S

N

S oO Attorneys for Defendants o

UNITED MODULE CORP., and oOo KERANOS, LLC

10

Dated: May 2, 2011 KING & SPALDING, LLP 11

By: /s/ Jeffrey D. Mills 12

Jeffrey D. Mills 13

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC. and 14

SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., 15 FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., and 16 ES, INC.; TAIWAN

ANALOG DEVIC

SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING

17

CO., LTD., TSMC NORTH AMERICA, and UBICOM, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS 18

CO., LTD., and SAMSUNG 19 SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

ee] ORDER -3- CASE NO. 10-CV-04241-LHK STIP. & p RDING EXTENSION OF STAY AND RELATED CASES REGA

Figure on page 5 of the opinion

5ase 2:11-cv-00333-RWS Document 32 _ Filed 05/03/11 Page 5 of 5 PagelD #:

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ joint stipulation, the parties are ordered to complete mediation M

N

YW with a Court ADR Program mediator on or before June 7, 2011. On or before June 8, 2011, the rt that the cases did not settle. - parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal, or notify the Cou H

OH These cases are stayed until June 8, 2011. n D

N

H IT IS SO ORDERED.

o O oO Dated: May 3, 2011 Fuey He. bh.

LUCYOA. KOH

10 United States District Judge

1]

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

ee CASE NO. 10-CV-04241-LHK STIP. & [>xORS ORDER

F STAY AND RELATED CASES REGARDING EXTENSION O

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. May 3, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00333-8
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00333-8

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.