Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2011)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00333, Dkt. No. 21
Decided
March 2, 2011
Judge
Lucy H. Koh, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER APPROVING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE re (52 in 5:10-cv-04241-LHK) Proposed Order, filed by Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
Length
3 pages

1 DAVID L. WITCOFF (IL State Bar No. 6183629)

dlwitcoff@jonesday.com 2 JONES DAY

77 West Wacker 3 Chicago, Illinois 60601

Telephone: 312-269-4259 4 Facsimile: 312-782-8585 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff,

FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 SAN JOSE DIVISION

10

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC., and Case No.: 10-CV-4241-LHK 11 SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO

12 Plaintiffs, PERMIT COUNSEL TO APPEAR

TELEPHONICALLY AT THE MARCH 3,

13 v. 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

AND HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS 14 UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS,

LLC,

15

Defendants. Date: March 3, 2011 16 Time: 1:30 p.m.

Courtroom: Courtroom 4, 5th Floor 17 Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 18 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR Case No.: 10-CV-05290-LHK

MANUFACTURING CO., LTD.,

19 TSMC NORTH AMERICA, and

UBICOM, INC.,

20

Plaintiffs, 21

v. 22 “

UNITED MODULE CORP., and 23 KERANOS, LLC,

24 Defendants. 25 26 27

STIP & [PROP] ORDER TO PERMIT COUNSEL Case No. 10-CV-4241-LHK TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE CONFERENCE and Related Cases

21 FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., Case No.: 10-CV-05196-LHK

NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., and 2 ANALOG DEVICES, INC.,

3 Plaintiffs, 4 v. 5 UNITED MODULE CORP., and

KERANOS, LLC,

6 7 Defendants. 8 Case No.: 11-CV-00430-PSG

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,

9

Plaintiffs, 10

v.

11 12 UNITED MODULE CORP., and

KERANOS, LLC,

13

Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

STIP. & [PROP] ORDER TO PERMIT COUNSEL TO APPEAR Case No. 10-CV-4241-LHK BY TELEPHONE CONFERENCE and Related Cases

31 A hearing on Defendants’ motions to dismiss and case management conference for the above-2

referenced cases is scheduled to take place on March 3, 2011. King & Spalding, the lead trial counsel 3

for all the plaintiffs in the above-referenced matters, will be attending the case management conference 4

in person. Co-counsel for Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., David L. Witcoff of Jones Day, who has 5

made an appearance in this case and will be located in Chicago at the time of the hearing, makes this 6

application to attend the hearing and case management conference telephonically. In compliance with 7

Local Rule 16-10, Mr. Witcoff respectfully makes this request to appear telephonically on March 3, 8

2011. 9 10

Dated: February 23, 2011 Respectfully submitted, 11 12

By /s/ David L. Witcoff 13 DAVID WITCOFF

dlwitcoff@joneseday.com

14 JONES DAY

77 West Wacker

15 Chicago, Illinois 60601

Tel: 312-269-4259

16 Fax: 312-782-8585 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff,

FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC..

18 19 20 21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 23

Dated: __March 2, 2011 _____________________________ 24 Honorable Lucy H. Koh

United States District Judge 25 26 27

SVI-90157v1

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00333-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00333-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.