Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 17, 2011)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00333
Decided
February 17, 2011
Judge
Document
Order (scanned)
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 17 Application of John Caracappa for Admission Pro Hac Vice representing Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc
Length
1 page
Figure on page 1 of the opinion

Case 2:11-cv-00333-R S Document 16 Filed 02/17/11 Page 1 of 1 PagelD #:

<pagelD> a!

7A “:o , /Q O &Q O Y / lo A N

O

H

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Dep ile4 “8 “ Qs, R Coe o B

“4% ‘ FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

“iat h H

N

W

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

N A . C 11-00430 lhk

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. CASE

Y NO o O

Plaintiff,

Reoposed)-

oc ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

v. FOR ADMISSIO

N OF ATTORNEY 10 UNITED MODULE CORP. and PRO HAC VIC

E

KERANOS LLC,

1]

Defendant.

tr 12 uo C / ainr 13 ofilaC f o

John Caracappa , whose business address

and telephone number is t 14 cir tsi D t cirts iD Steptoe & Johnson LLP, 1330 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.,

15

Washington, DC 20036-1795, Tel. (202) 429-6413 se m ta ehtro 16 tS N e ht

and who is an active member in good standing of the bar of USDC E.D. Texas ro F 17 d etin having applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of U 18

California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Plaintiffs. 19

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and 20

conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3, All papers filed by the attomey must indicate appearance pro hac 21

vice, Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application 22

will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements 23

contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing. 24

2256 H. Ket

Dated: February 17, 2011 “

Honora Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 27

28

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00333 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 17, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00333-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00333-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.