2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ain 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION r
o t rufil 12 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al., ) Case No.: 10-CV-04241-LHK oa ) CC tc fo 13 Plaintiffs, ) ORDER SETTING BRIEFING ir tc ) SCHEDULE IN RELATED CASES tsiirt 14 v. ) Ds )
i
D set n 15 UNITED MODULE CORP., et al., ) ar ) te S dhtr 16 Defendants. )
o _______________________________________ )
eN t in e 17 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUF. CO. ) Case No.: 10-CV-05290-LHK Uht LTD., et al., )
r 18 ) o F
Plaintiffs, )
19 v. )
)
20 UNITED MODULE CORP., et al., )
)
21 Defendants. )
_______________________________________ )
22 FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., et al., ) Case No.: 10-CV-05196-LHK
)
23 Plaintiffs, )
)
24 v. )
)
25 UNITED MODULE CORP., et al., )
)
26 Defendants ) ) 27
21 In each of these related cases, Defendants have filed motions to dismiss, or in the 2
alternative, to stay or transfer to the Eastern District of Texas. Those motions are set for hearing on 3
March 3, 2011. The Court finds a briefing schedule appropriate. Accordingly, Oppositions are due 4
by Friday, February 4, 2011, and Replies are due by Friday, February 11, 2011. To the extent 5
practicable, Plaintiffs and Defendants in each of the cases should coordinate in order to avoid 6
repetitive briefing before the Court.
7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated: January 13, 2011 _________________________________ 10
LUCY H. KOH inr United States Distric t Judge a 11
o t rf 12 ui
l
oa CC
13 tf co i rt
c
ti 14 sr it Ds
i
D s 15 e tn ar te Sh 16 t dr
o
eN t i 17 ne Uh
t r 18 o F
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27