IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
VASU HOLDINGS, LLC, §
§
Plaintiff,
§ Case No. 2:24-cv-00034-JRG-RSP v.
§
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
§
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
§
AMERICA, INC.,
§ §
Defendants.
ORDER
Plaintiff previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Obviousness -Type Double Patenting (Dkt. No. 129); Defendants previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Doctrine of Equivalents (Dkt. No. 125.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 252), recommending denial of Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion for the ’996 Patent; denial as moot of Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion for the ’281 Patent; and denial as moot for Defendants’ summary judgment motion. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the . Recommendation is ADOPTED.
It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (Dkt. No. 129) is DENIED as to the ’996 Patent and DENIED AS MOOT as to the ’281 Patent.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Doctrine of Equivalents (Dkt. No. 125) be DENIED AS MOOT.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of April, 2026.