Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Vasu Holdings, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00034 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2026)

Denied
Summary Judgment Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00034, Dkt. No. 301
Decided
May 1, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 242 Report and Recommendations, 128 Sealed Motion filed by Vasu Holdings, LLC. (Motion(s)242, 128 terminated)
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

VASU HOLDINGS, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff,

§ Case No. 2:24-cv-00034-JRG-RSP v.

§

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,

§

LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

§

AMERICA, INC.,

§ §

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the Unavailability of Non-. Infringing Alternatives (Dkt. No. 128.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 242), recommending denial of Plaintiff’s summary judgment motion. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment on the Unavailability of Non-Infringing Alternatives (Dkt. No. 128) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 1st day of May, 2026.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Vasu Holdings, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:24-cv-00034 (E.D. Tex. May 1, 2026).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_24-cv-00034-7
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_24-cv-00034-7

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case