Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 300
Decided
July 15, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 287 Report and Recommendations re 107 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (Motion(s)107, 287 terminated)
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION §

CLO VIRTUAL FASHION INC., §

Plaintiff, §

§

v. CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00274-JRG-RSP

§

ZHEJIANG LINGDI DIGITAL

§

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (D/B/A

§

LINCTEX),

§

Defendant. §

ORDER

Defendant Linctex previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 107.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 287), recommending grant of Linctex’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement as to (1) Plaintiff being estopped from asserting the DoE as to limitation [1.f] of the ’773 patent and limitation [1.b.vii] of the ’355 patent, (2) no infringement of the ’355 Patent and claims 4, 5, 10, and 11 of the ’773 Patent by Subsequent Versions of Defendant’s software; and otherwise denying the Motion. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 107) is GRANTED as to (1) Plaintiff being estopped from asserting the DoE as to limitation [1.f] of the ’773 patent and limitation [1.b.vii] of the ’355 patent, (2) no infringement of the ’355 Patent and claims 4, 5, 10, and 11 of the ’773 Patent by Subsequent Versions of Defendant’s software; and is otherwise DENIED.

2.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 15th day of July, 2025.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00274-9
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00274-9

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.