Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 16, 2024)

Denied
Motion to Dismiss Venue / Transfer
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00274, Dkt. No. 66
Decided
September 16, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 62 Report and Recommendations (Motion(s)12 terminated)
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

CLO VIRTUAL FASHION INC., §

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v. §

§ CASE NO. 2:23-cv-00274-JRG-RSP ZHEJIANG LINGDI DIGITAL §

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (D/B/A §

LINCTEX), §

§

Defendants.

ORDER .

Linctex previously filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 12.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 62), recommending denial of Linctex’s Motion to Dismiss. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 12) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 16th day of September, 2024.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CLO Virtual Fashion Inc. v. Zhejiang Lingdi Digital Technology Co., Ltd., No. 2:23-cv-00274 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 16, 2024).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00274-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00274-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case