IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARSHALL DIVISION
LIONRA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, §
§
Plaintiff, §
§ Case No. 2:22-CV-00322-JRG-RSP v. §
§
FORTINET, INC., §
§
Defendant. §
ORDER
Plaintiff Liorna Technologies Ltd. previously filed motions for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 258, 262) and Defendant Fortinet, Inc. previously filed motions for partial summary judgment (Dkt. Nos. 259, 260, 261) and a motion to reconsider (Dkt. No. 554). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Reports and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 479, 480, 482, 542, 579, 580) on these motions. Lionra and Fortinet have now filed various Objections (Dkt. No. 508, 549, 553, 598).
After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on these motions, the Reports and Recommendations, and the briefing on the parties Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Reports and Recommendations and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Reports and Recommendations were erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES the parties’ Objections and ADOPTS the Reports and Recommendations and orders:
- • the Partial Summary Judgment to Enforce Sotera Stipulations (Dkt. No. 258) is DENIED
- • the Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §101 (Dkt. No. 259) is DENIED and the Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 262) is GRANTED
2.
- • the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 260) is DENIED
- • the Motion regarding License, or in the Alternative, Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 261) is GRANTED but that the subsequently requested relief is DENIED. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of August, 2024.