Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. May 21, 2024)

Granted in Part
Summary Judgment License / Exhaustion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00322, Dkt. No. 530
Decided
May 21, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 512 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF RELEASE OF CLAIMS filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. (Motion(s)512 terminated)
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

LIONRA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, §

§

Plaintiff, § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00322-JRG-RSP § (LEAD CASE)

FORTINET, INC., §

§

Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Before the Court is Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s Motion For Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment of Release of Claims (Dkt. No. 512). After consideration, the Court GRANTS AS MODIFIED the motion as provided below.

PAN requests leave from the Court to file a summary judgment motion after the deadline for dispositive motions regarding a License Agreement entered into between Lionra and one of PAN’s suppliers. (Mot. at 1.) The Agreement was entered into on February 23, 2024 and produced April 11, 2024. (Id.) PAN moved for leave May 10, 2024. (Id.) At that time, trial was set for May 20, 2024 but the parties’ trial date has since been continued.

The Court GRANTS PAN’s Motion and ORDERS Lionra to file a response, if any, by May 27, 2024 not to exceed the number of pages used by PAN in its motion for summary judgment. No further briefing will be considered.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Lionra Technologies Limited v. Fortinet, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00322 (E.D. Tex. May 21, 2024).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00322-10
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00322-10

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case