1 JAMES C. OTTESON, State Bar No. 157781
jim@agilityiplaw.com
2 MONICA MUCCHETTI ENO, State Bar No. 164107
monica@agilityiplaw.com
3 THERESA E. NORTON, State Bar No. 193530
tess@agilityiplaw.com
4 AGILITY IP LAW
1900 University Circle, Suite 201
5 East Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: (650) 227-4800
6 Facsimile: (650) 318-3483 7 Attorneys for Defendant
KERANOS, LLC
8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 SAN JOSE DIVISION
12 13 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC. and Related Cases:
SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
14 CASE NO.: CV-10-04241-LHK
Plaintiffs,
15 CASE NO.: CV-10-05196-LHK
v.
16 CASE NO.: CV-10-05290-LHK
UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS,
17 LLC, CASE NO.: CV-11-00430-LHK
18 Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 19 DEFENDANT’S ADMINISTRATIVE
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCOR, INC.,
REQUEST TO FILE PORTIONS OF NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., and
20 DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL
ANALOG DEVICES, INC.
21
Plaintiffs,
Date: March 3, 2011 22 Time: 1:30 p.m.
v.
Courtroom: Courtroom 4, 5th floor 23 Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS, LLC,
24
Defendants.
25 26 27
21 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR
MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., TSMC NORTH
2 AMERICA, and UBICOM, INC., 3 Plaintiffs, 4 v. 5 UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS,
LLC,
6
Defendants.
7 8 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and
SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
9
Plaintiffs,
10
v.
11
UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS,
12 LLC,
13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
31 Now before the Court is Defendant Keranos, LLC’s (“Defendant”) Administrative 2 Request to File Portions of Document Under Seal. Upon consideration of the motion, and of the 3 supporting declaration of Theresa E. Norton filed therewith, the Court finds there to be good 4 cause for granting Defendant’s request to file under seal. 5 GOOD CAUSE having been shown, the Court finds that: 6 1. Defendant possesses overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of 7 public access to the record to the following portions of Defendant Keranos, LLC’s Reply in 8 Support of Motions to Dismiss: page 7, lines 18-26, and footnote 3 on page 7. 9 2. Defendant’s overriding confidentiality interests support sealing the record; 10 3. A substantial probability exists that Defendant’s overriding confidentiality 11 interests will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; 12 4. The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and 13 5. No less restrictive means exist to achieve this overriding interest. 14 15 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Keranos, LLC’s Administrative Request 16 to File Portions of Document Under Seal is GRANTED. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED.
19 20
February 28, 2011
21 DATED: ______________________ _________________________________
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh 22
United States District Court Judge 23 24 25 26 27