se 2:11-cv-00332-RWS Document 45 Filed 02/18/11 Page 1 of 4 PagelD #:
PAUL J. ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585) pandre@kslaw.com LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404) lkobialka@kslaw.com wW SEAN BOYLE (State Bar No. 238128) sboyle@kslaw.com & KING & SPALDING LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 NM Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 590-0700 D
HB Facsimile: (650) 590-1900 T
Attorneys for Plaintiffs S
HIP TECHNOLOGY INC., SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
MICROC
OC VICES, INC., FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., NATIONAL
ANALOG DE
CTOR CORP., TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, CO., SEMICONDU
O MERICA, UBICOM, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., o LTD., TSMC NORTH A and SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. 10
(Complete List of Counsel and Parties Listed on Signature Page) 1]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC., and Case No.: CV10-4241-LHK 15
SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC..,
[PROROSED] ORDER GRANTING 16
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE Plaintiffs,
REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENT V.
17
UNDER SEAL
UNITED MODULE CORP., and 18
C, Date: March 3, 2011 KERANOS, LL
Time: 1:30 p.m. 19 Courtroom: Courtroom 4, 5" floor
Defendants.
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 20
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
21
MICONDUCTOR, Case No.: CV10-05290-LHK TAIWAN SE oe
MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., TSMC
AMERICA, and UBICOM, INC., DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL NORTH
23
Plaintiffs,
24
V.
25
UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS, LLC,
26
Defendants.
27
ING ADMIN. REQUEST TO CASE NO. CV10-4241-LHK ] ORDER GRANT
DER SEAL AND RELATED CASES FILE DOCUMENTS UN
2Se 2:11-cv-00332-RWS Document 45 Filed 02/18/11 Page 2 of 4 PagelD #: saA
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., and Case No. CV10-05196-LHK NW ANALOG DEVICES, INC.,
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL w W Plaintiffs,
V. -& -
UNITED MODULE CORP., and n O KERANOS, LLC,
WD Defendants. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and Case No.: CV11-00439-LHK NN SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
O
C Plaintiffs,
Vv.
o o UNITED MODULE CORP., and 10 KERANOS, LLC,
11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
25 26 ]
ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. REQUEST TO CASE NO. CV10-4241-LHK [PROPOSED}
R SEAL AND RELATED CASES FILE DOCUMENTS UNDE
3C D se 2:11-cv-00332-RWS Document45 _ Filed 02/18/11 Page 3 of 4 PagelD #:
Plaintiffs Microchip Technology, Inc., Silicon Storage Technology, Inc., Analog Devices, reescale Semiconductor, Inc., National Semiconductor Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Inc., F
uring Co., Ltd., TSMC North America, Ubicom, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Manufact &
msung Semiconductor, Inc.,. collectively (“Plaintiffs”) filed an Administrative Request to and Sa n W
uments Under Seal (“Administrative Request”), which was heard before this Court on nD File Doc NH February 4, 2011. oe aration of Truman Fenton filed in support
Upon consideration of this request and the decl
oo ve Request, the Court finds there to be good cause for granting Plaintiffs’ O of the Administrati 10 request to file certain documents and portions of documents under seal. 11 een shown, the Court finds that the following documents shall
GOOD CAUSE having b
12
be filed under seal:
ttachments 1 and 2 of the Declaration of Truman Fenton filed in support of ® A
ntiffs’ Combined Response to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, Transfer, or 14 Plai
hich are documents both entitled “Exclusive License Patent License and Stay, w
15
Royalty Agreement”;
16
achment 6 of the Declaration of Truman Fenton filed in support of Plaintiffs’ 2 Att
ned Response to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay, which Combi
17
ment entitled “Plaintiff Keranos, LLC’s Opposition to Motions to is a docu
y Defendants Microchip Technology, Inc., Analog Devices, Inc., 18 Dismiss b
ualcomm, Inc., EM Microelectronics - U.S., Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation, Q
[9 America, Inc. and Vis Micro, Inc.” filed under seal on October 12, 2010 in
Epson the Eastern District of Texas;
20
phs 5 and 8 of the Declaration of Truman Fenton filed in 3 Portions of Paragra
21
’ Combined Response to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, support of Plaintiffs
22 Transfer, or Stay; and 23 ffs’ Combined Response to Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss,
° Portions of Plainti
Transfer, or Stay.
24
own, the Court finds that the documents or portions of the GOOD CAUSE having been sh
foregoing documents shall be filed under seal. 26
D that Plaintiffs’ Request to File Documents Under Seal is IT IS THEREFORE ORDERE
27
DER GRANTING ADMIN. REQUEST TO CASE NO. CV10-4241-LHK [PROPOSED] OR
EAL AND RELATED CASES FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER S
4ise 2:11-cv-00332-RWS Document 45 Filed 02/18/11 Page 4 of 4 PagelD #:
GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 18 , 2011
United Sta¥€s District Judge D
D
N
N e S o n o
10 i 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
24 25 26 27
UEST TO CASE NO, CV10-4241-LHK 3DLORDER GRANTING ADMIN. REQ
AND RELATED CASES FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL