Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Microchip Technology, Inc., et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00332 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2011)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:11-cv-00332
Decided
March 3, 2011
Judge
—
Document
Order (scanned)
Docket Entry
ORDER re 60 Granting Application of Truman Fenton for Admission Pro Hac Vice in case 5:10-cv-04241-LHK; 5:10-cv-05196-LHK; 5:10-cv-05290-LHK; and 5:11-cv-00430-LHK
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

elD> wv)

<pag

/

tei TARD w Nog

N

W w COURPS7A|

STATES DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED

W

R CALIF ORNIA

HERN DISTRICT OF

L FOR THE NORT

Case No.. 10-CV-4241-LHK No.: 10-CV-05290-LHK Case

LICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC,

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC., SU V-05196.-LHK

W E NO. Case No.:- 101-0C.CV. D CAS

SEMICONDOU.,C LTTODR.,, TINSMC.,C N NAOTRIOTHN AL

MERICA, UBIICCOONMD, UINCCT.,O FRR MEEASNCUAFLAEC TURING C CV-430-LHK

ATAIWAN SEM Case No.: 11-

G DEVICES, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., ANALO

N

A DUCTOR, INC,

CO., LTD., & SAMSUNG SEMICON

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

o Prepesed) e Plaintiff, f NG APPLICATION

ORDER GRANTI

ON OF ATTORNEY

FOR ADMISSI

o v. C VICE

PRO HAC

ORP., and KERANOS, LLC

UNITED MODULE C

10

11

Defendant.

t 12 / ru oC

13 and telephone number is ainrofilfo , whose business address aC 14 Truman Fenton tc irtsiD tcir King & Spalding, LLP tsiD 15 ss Avenue, Suite 3200

401 Congre

Austin, Texas 78701

ail: tfenton@kslaw.com

hone: 512.457.2000; Em

s n P Texas et rehtht 16 he Eastern and Western Districts of at roN ar of u:s. vistrict Courts for t S od standing of the b

active member in go

e and who is an

Northern District of ro 17 ion to practice in the Fed action for admiss

ed in the above-entitl

having appli

d AGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., TASWOANM, INC., et TECHNOLOGY INC., SILICON SLTTODR., TSMC NORTH AMERICA, UBIC in 18 MICROOCHNIDPU CTOR MANUFACTURING CO., U 1 , SEMIC ORP., ANALOG

1(* INC., NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR C

1 1 ng FRIEESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR,

c vice basis, representi

Cali fornia ona pro ha G SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

LECTRONICS CO., LID., & SAMSUN

DEVICES, INC, SAMSUNG E

19 bject to the terms and

lication is granted, su ERED THAT the app

T IS HEREBY ORD

I

e appearance pro hac 20 attorney must indicat

papers filed by the

f Civil L.R. 11-3. All

conditions o

ed in the application 21 co-counsel designat

communication with

e of papers upon and

vice. Servic

ct to the requirements 22 n this action are subje

ty. All future filings i

itute notice to the par

will const

23

ectronic Case Filing.

eral Order No. 45, El

contained in Gen

24

25

Dated: March 3, 2011 1. Koh ; 26

Stes District Judge United

27

28

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Microchip Technology, Inc., et al v. United Module Corp. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00332 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00332-11
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_11-cv-00332-11

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case