1 MCKOOL SMITH PC
Gayle Rosenstein Klein 2
State Bar No. 237975 399 Park Avenue, Suite 3200 3
New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 402-9400 4
Facsimile: (212) 402-9444 5 Email: gklein@mckoolsmith.com
6
Attorneys for SPECIALLY APPEARING DEFENDANT Wi-LAN Inc. 7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11 S
Y
E
N
R 12
OTT MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR INC., Case No. C 08-CV-05544 (JW) A• ET AL.,
13 HTI NOI . STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
.Y FINDING AS MOOT
M T N Plaintiffs, A O R D E R TO EXTEND TIME TO
S R ,K 14
L O R
PO O RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
O R
O Y v. KC W
15 C L E
M A N
NOI WI-LAN INC.,
S 16
S
E
F
OR Defendant. P 17
A
18
19 Subject to its special appearance, specially appearing defendant Wi-LAN Inc., by and
20 through its counsel, requests that defendant’s time to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint
21 be extended until a date ten (10) days after this Court’s ruling on Wi-LAN Inc.’s Motion to
22 Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, and
23 Motion to Transfer to First Filed Forum, filed January 15, 2009, in a related declaratory
24 judgment action styled Intel Corp. v Wi-LAN Inc. et al, 5:08-cv-4555 (N.D. Cal.). Defendant’s
25 time to respond to the complaint in this action was previously extended from January 26, 2009,
26 to February 25, 2009, by Order dated February 9, 2009 (DI 10). Plaintiffs Marvell
27 Semiconductor, Inc. and Marvell Asia Pte., Ltd. do not oppose defendant’s request.
2This stipulated request is made on the grounds that the parties wish to avoid duplicative 2
motion practice. The Court’s anticipated ruling in the related Intel case will give the parties 3
substantial guidance as to how to proceed in the instant action. Accordingly, it is in the interest 4
of private and judicial economy to extend the time for Wi-LAN Inc. to answer or otherwise plead 5
until a date ten (10) days after this Court’s ruling in Intel Corp. v. Wi-LAN Inc. et al. 6
So stipulated,
7
8
9
10 S
Y 11
E
N
R
O
T 12
T
A •
H N .
T O Y
13 I I .
M T N
A
S R ,
O K
L P R
O O 14
R
O O Y
KC W
C L
E
M A N 15
N
O
I
S
S
E 16
F
O
R
P
A
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
31 Dated: February 18, 2009 MCKOOL SMITH PC
2 By: /s/
MCKOOL SMITH PC
3
Gayle Rosenstein Klein State Bar No. 237975 4
399 Park Avenue, Suite 3200 5 New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (212) 402-9400 6 Facsimile: (212) 402-9444
Email: gklein@mckoolsmith.com 7
Attorneys for SPECIALLY 8
APPEARING DEFENDANT Wi-LAN 9 Inc.
10
Dated: February 19, 2009 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, S FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, Y 11
ENR L.L.P.
O
T 12
T
A
By: /s/ • H N .
TIM OITA Y.N Lily Lim
13 S L ROP , KR State Bar No. 214536 O O 14
R FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
O O Y
KC W
C LN E FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, M A N 15
OIS L.L.P.
SFO 3300 Hillview Ave. E 16
R Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 P
A
17 Telephone: (650) 849-6600
Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 18
Email: lily.lim@finnegan.com 19
Attorneys for plaintiffs Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. and Marvell Asia 20
Pte., Ltd.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
41 IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED:
Upon the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, it is ORDERED that 2 The Court's Order on February 20, 2009 STAYED all deadlines in ALL related Cases. The Stipulation is found a
sMpOeOciTa. lly appearing defendant Wi-LAN Inc.’s time to answer or otherwise plead to the complaint 3
herein is hereby extended until a date ten (10) days after this Court’s ruling on Wi-LAN Inc.’s 4
Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Improper 5
Venue, filed January 15, 2009, in a related declaratory judgment action styled Intel Corp. v Wi-6
LAN Inc. et al, 5:08-cv-4555 (N.D. Cal.). 7
8
February 20
9 Dated: ________________, 2009 By:
United States District Court Judge 10 S
Y 11
E
N
R
O
T 12
T
A •
H N .
T O Y
13 I I .
M T N
A
S R ,
O K
L P R
O O 14
R
O O Y
KC W
C L
E
M A N 15
N
O
I
S
S
E 16
F
O
R
P
A
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
5CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on February 19, 2009, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 4
AMENDED COMPLAINT was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF 5
System. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system to 6
all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. Parties may access this filing through the 7
Court’s electronic filing system. 8
9
By: /s/ Michael G. McManus 10 Michael G. McManus
11 S
Y
E
N
R 12
O
T
T
A •
13 H N
.Y
T O
I I .
M T N
A
S R ,K 14
L O R
P O
O R
O Y
O
KC W
15 C L E
M A N
N
O
I
S 16
S
E
F
O
R
P 17
A
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27