Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Marvell Semiconductor Inc. et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,, No. 2:09-cv-00323 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2009)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00323, Dkt. No. 10
Decided
February 9, 2009
Judge
James Ware, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT re 9 Stipulation filed by WI-Lan, Inc. Deadline to file Amended Complaint by 2/25/2009
Length
3 pages

ES I

C

T T

T C

S O

D U

E R

T T ED

NT

1 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP I RA

N G

A. James Isbester (State Bar No. 129820)

U A 2

Two Embarcadero Center Eighth Floor I

N San Francisco, CA 94111 are

N W R 3 mes

e Ja Telephone: (415) 576-0200 O udg O

J

R F Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 I 4 T L

H A

Email: jisbester@townsend.com

E C

5 R F

N O

D T

Specially appearing as attorneys IS IC

TR

2/9/2009 6

for defendant Wi-LAN Inc. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., and Case No. C 08-CV-05544 JW 12

MARVELL ASIA PTE., LTD.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

13 EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO

Plaintiffs,

AMENDED COMPLAINT

14

v. 15

WI-LAN INC.,

16

Defendant. 17 18 19 Specially appearing defendant Wi-LAN Inc., by and through its counsel, requests that 20

defendant’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint herein be extended until 21

February 25, 2009. 22 This stipulated request is made on the grounds that defendants require the additional time 23

in which to prepare appropriate responses. The complaint in this case was filed on December 10, 24

2008. Plaintiffs Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. and Marvell Asia Pte., Ltd. do not oppose 25

defendants' request. 26 27

22 So stipulated,

3 4 Dated: January 16, 2009 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 5

By: /S/ 6

A. James Isbester (SBN 129820)

TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND

7

CREW LLP

8 Two Embarcadero Center Eighth Floor

San Francisco, CA 94111 9 Telephone: (415) 576-0200

Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 10

Email: jisbester@townsend.com 11

Attorneys for defendant Wi-LAN Inc. 12

Dated: January 16, 2009 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 13

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

14

By: /S/ 15

C. Larry O’Rourke (SBN 219255)

16 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

17

3300 Hillview Ave. Palo Alto, California 94304-1203 18

Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 19

Email: larry.o’rourke@finnegan.com 20

Attorneys for plaintiffs Marvell 21

Semiconductor, Inc. and Marvell Asia Pte., Ltd.

22 Upon the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, it is SO ORDERED. 23 24

Dated: ______F_e_br_u_a_ry_ 9____, 2009 By: 25

United States District Court Judge 26 27

3CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2 The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have 3

consented to electronic service are being served this date with a copy of this document via the 4

Court's CM/ECF system per General Order No. 45(IX)(B). Any other counsel of record will be 5

served by electronic mail, facsimile transmission, and/or first class mail on this same date. 6 Executed on January 23, 2009, at San Francisco, California.

7 8

/s/ 9

Victoria E. Hopper 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

TO AMENDED COMPLAINT - i -

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Marvell Semiconductor Inc. et al v. WI-Lan, Inc.,, No. 2:09-cv-00323 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 9, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00323-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00323-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.