1 C. Larry O’Rourke (State Bar No. 219255)
larry.o’rourke@finnegan.com
2 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
3300 Hillview Ave
3 Palo Alto, California 94304-1203
Telephone: (650) 849-6600
4 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 5 Roger D. Taylor (To Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
roger.taylor@finnegan.com
6 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P
303 Peachtree Street, N.E.
7 Atlanta, GA 30308-3263
Telephone: (404) 653-6400
8 Facsimile: (404) 653-6444 9 Linda Thayer (State Bar No. 195115)
linda.thayer@finnegan.com
DISTR
ES IC
T T
10 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.PA.
T C S O 55 Cambridge Parkway
D U 11 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142-1215 E R
T T
ED
Telephone: (617) 452-1600 I NT
RA
N G
12 Facsimile: (617) 452-1666
U A I
N N Ware R 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs es
Jam dge O O Ju MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. F
R
T I 14 and MARVELL ASIA PTE., LTD. L
H A E C R F
N O
D T
15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IST IC
R
1/16/2009 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17 INTEL CORPORATION, Case No. 5:08-cv-4555 (JW)
Plaintiff,
18 v. Honorable James Ware 19 WI-LAN, INC., WI-LAN TECHNOLOGIES [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
CORPORATION, WI-LAN MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
20 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and WI-LAN V- AND MARVELL ASIA PTE. LTD.’S
CHIP CORP., ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
21 Defendant. CONSIDER WHETHER CASES
SHOULD BE RELATED [Civ. L.R. 3-12] 22 23
21 This Document Relates to: 2 Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. and Marvell Asia Pte. Ltd. v. Wi-LAN, Inc. 3 N.D. Cal. Case No. 5:08-cv-05544 JW 4 This matter comes before the Court in Marvell Semiconductor, inc. and Marvell Asia Pte. 5 Ltd’s (“Marvell”) Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related, filed on 6 December 16, 2008, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12. The Court, having fully considered the 7 papers and pleadings on file and submitted herewith, and good cause appearing, 8 HEREBY GRANTS Marvell’s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should 9 be Related.
10 IT IS SO ORDERED that the following cases are related within the meaning of Local 11 Rule 3-12(e): 12 Intel Corporation v. Wi-LAN, inc., et al. Case No. 5:08-cv-4555 (JW) 13 Broadcom Corporation, et al. v. Wi-LAN, Inc. Case No. C 08-05543 EMC 14 Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., et al. v. Wi-LAN,Inc. Case No. 5:08-cv-05544 (JW) 15 This o rder also terminates Docket Item No. 23 in Case No. 08-04555 JW.
Jan 16, 2009
16 Dated: ____________, 2008 __________________________
The Honorable James Ware 17 United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23
31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3 4 INTEL CORPORATION, Case No. 5:08-cv-4555 (JW) 5 Plaintiff,
PROOF OF SERVICE
6 v. 7 WI-LAN, INC., WI-LAN TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION, WI-LAN
8 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and WI-LAN V-
CHIP CORP.,
9
Defendants.
10 11 This Document Relates to: 12 Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. and Marvell Asia Pte. Ltd. v. Wi-LAN, Inc. 13 N.D. Cal. Case No. 5:08-cv-05544 JW 14 15 I hereby certify that a copy of the [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 16 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE
17 RELATED will be served via the Court’s electronic case filing system on the following: 18 Adam R. Alper
Christian Chadd Taylor
19 Kirkland & Ellis LLP
555 California Street, 24th Floor
20 San Francisco, CA 94101-1501
aalper@kirkland.com
21 ctaylor@kirkland.com 22 Gregory S. Arovas
John M. Desmarais
23 Kirkland & Ellis LLP
41 153 East 53rd Street
New York, NY 10022-4675
2 garovas@kirkland.com
jdesmarais@kirkland.com
3 Attorneys for Plaintiff Intel Corporation 4 A. James Isbester
Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP
5 Two Embarcadero Center, Eighth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
6 Jamie@itpatentcounsel.com
Attorney for Defendant Wi-LAN, Inc.
7 8
DATED: December 16, 2008 _/s/ C. Larry O’Rourke_____________
C. Larry O’Rourke
9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23