Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Intel Corporation v. Wi-Lan, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2009)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00184, Dkt. No. 53
Decided
February 20, 2009
Judge
James Ware, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 Stipulation. The Clerk SHALL terminate these parties from the docket., filed by Wi-Lan Technologies, Inc., Wi-Lan V-Chip Corp, Wi-Lan Technologies Corporation, Wi-Lan, Inc
Length
2 pages

1 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP

DISTR

A. JAMES ISBESTER (State Bar No. 129820) ES IC

T T

2 th A

Two Embarcadero Center, 8 Floor T C

S O

San Francisco, California 94111 U

D

3 Telephone: 415.576.0200 E R

T ED T

ER

Facsimile: 415.576.0300 RD

I O O

N S S

4 T I

Email: jisbester@townsend.com I

U A

I

5 N

Specially appearing as attorney for Defendants

N Ware R

mes WI-LAN INC. WI-LAN TECHNOLOGIES ge Ja

O Jud O

6 CORPORATION, WI-LAN TECHNOLOGIES INC. R F

T I

L

AND WI-LAN V-CHIP CORPORATION H A

7 E C

R F

N O

D T

ISTRIC

8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 SAN JOSE DIVISION

12

INTEL CORPORATION, Case No. 5:08-cv-4555 JW (HRL)

13

Plaintiff,

14 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

v. ORDER DISMISSING WI-LAN

15 TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,

WI-LAN INC., WI-LAN TECHNOLOGIES WI-LAN TECHNOLOGIES INC., AND

16 CORPORATION, WI-LAN TECHNOLOGIES WI-LAN V-CHIP CORP.

INC., and WI-LAN V-CHIP CORP.,

17

Defendants.

18 19 20 Specially appearing defendants Wi-LAN Inc., Wi-LAN Technologies Corporation, Wi-LAN 21 Technologies Inc. and Wi-LAN V-Chip Corporation and plaintiff Intel Corporation (“Intel”), by and 22 through their respective counsel, hereby submit the following stipulation. 23 RECITALS

24 As disclosed in the attached Declaration of William Middleton Regarding Ownership of 25 Patents In Suit, Defendants have represented to Intel that none of Wi-LAN Technologies Corporation, 26 Wi-LAN Technologies Inc. and Wi-LAN V-Chip Corporation (collectively, the “Non-Owner 27 Defendants”) currently holds any interest in any of the patents-in-suit. Accordingly, none of the Non-28 Owner Defendants presently needs to be a party to this matter in order that the Court can fully resolve2 1 all issues now before it. By entering into this stipulation, Intel takes no position on the ownership of 2 the patents-in-suit, and reserves all right and arguments on that issue and any transactions regarding 3 the patents-in-suit. 4 STIPULATION

5 Therefore, the parties stipulate as follows: 6 1. Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Non-Owner 7 Defendants are each dismissed without prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. 8 9 Respectfully submitted, 10

DATED: January 15, 2009 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 11

By: /s/

12

A. James Isbester

13

Attorney for Specially Appearing Defendants Wi-LAN Inc., WI-LAN Technologies Corporation, Wi-LAN Technologies 14

Inc., and Wi-LAN V-Chip Corp.

15 16

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

17 18

By: /s/ Adam Alper

19 20

Attorneys for Plaintiff Intel Corporation

21 22 23 ORDER

24 Upon the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk shall terminate these parties from the docket. 26

DATED: FJaenburuaaryry _ 2_0_,, 22000099 By:

Honorable James Ware

27

United States District Court Judge

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intel Corporation v. Wi-Lan, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 20, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00184-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00184-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.