Intel Corporation v. Wi-Lan, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 27, 2008) — Order (Dkt. 16)

DISTR

ES I

T T

1 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP A

T C

Daniel J. Furniss (State Bar No. 73531) S O

D U

2 A. James Isbester (State Bar No. 129820)

E R Two Embarcadero Center Eighth Floor T

T

ED

NT

3 San Francisco, CA 94111 I RA

N G

Telephone: (415) 576-0200

U A 4 Facsimile: (415) 576-0300

I Email: djfurniss@townsend.com N

N Ware R 5 jisbester@townsend.com mes

e Ja O udg O

J

R F

6 Attorneys for specially appearing defendants I

T L

Wi-LAN, Inc., Wi-LAN Technologies H A E C

7 Corporation, Wi-LAN Technologies, Inc., R F

N O and Wi-LAN V-Chip Corp. D T

IS IC

TR

8 10/27/2008 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 SAN JOSE DIVISION

12 13 INTEL CORPORATION, Case No. C 08-CV-04555 HJWR L(H RL) 14 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO

15 v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 WI-LAN, INC., WI-LAN TECHNOLOGIES

CORPORATION, WI-LAN

17 TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and WI-LAN V-

CHIP CORP.,

Defendants.

19 20 21 Specially appearing defendants Wi-LAN, Inc., Wi-LAN Technologies Corporation, Wi-22 LAN Technologies, Inc., and Wi-LAN V-Chip Corp, by and through their counsel, request that 23 defendants’ time to answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint herein be extended 24 until January 5, 2009. 25 This stipulated request is made on the grounds that defendants require the additional time 26 in which to prepare appropriate responses. Defendants’ time to respond to the complaint has not 27 previously been extended, either by stipulation or by order. The complaint in this case was filed 28 on September 30, 2008. Plaintiff Intel Corporation does not oppose defendants' request.

2So stipulated,

Dated: October 22, 2008 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP 3 4

By: /S/

5 A. JAMES ISBESTER

6 Attorneys for specially appearing defendants

Wi-LAN, Inc., Wi-LAN Technologies, 7 Corporation, Wi-LAN Technologies, Inc., and

Wi-LAN V-Chip Corp.

Dated: October ___, 2008 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

By: ______________/S/________________________ 11 ADAM R. ALPER

12 Attorneys for plaintiff Intel Corporation. 13 Upon the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, it is 14 SO ORDERED.

15 Dated: ___O_c_to_b_e_r _²⁷______, 2008 By: ________________________________________

United States District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.