Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Intel Corporation v. Wi-Lan, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 16, 2009)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:09-cv-00184, Dkt. No. 39
Decided
January 16, 2009
Judge
James Ware, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
RELATED CASE ORDER. Related cases: Create association to 5:08-cv-05544-JW, 5:08-cv-05544-EMC. Joint case management conference statement due 3/6/2009. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/16/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, …
Length
2 pages

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER

A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination. C 08-05543 EMC Broadcom Corp., v. Wi-Lan, Inc C 08-04555 JW Intel Corporation v. Wi-Lan, Inc. C 08-05544 JW Marvell Semiconductor, Inc., et al. v. Wi-LAN,Inc. I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me. ____JW_____

ORDER

Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge.

Dated: January 16, 2009

Judge James Ware

2CLERK’S NOTICE

The Court coordinates a case management conference in ALL cases for March 16, 2009 at 10:0 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. The parties are to file a joint case management conference statement in each respective case docket on or before March 6, 2009. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

DATED: ____January 16, 2009____ By:

Deputy Clerk

C E RTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

DATED: ___January 16, 2009____ By: Deputy Clerk

Copies to: Courtroom Deputies

Case Systems Administrators Counsel of Record

Entered into Assignment Program: (date)

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intel Corporation v. Wi-Lan, Inc., No. 2:09-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 16, 2009).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00184-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_09-cv-00184-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.