Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

ARM Ltd. et al v. Mosaid Technologies, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00008 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2012)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00008, Dkt. No. 33
Decided
January 4, 2012
Judge
Charles R. Breyer, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 18 Motion to Transfer Case. (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012) [Transferred from California Northern on 1/9/2012.].
Length
1 page

2 3 4 5 6 7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 aa

iirr 11 No. C 11-03869 CRB nn ARM LTD. ET AL, tt oo

rr ff

uuoo iiaa 12 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE ll Plaintiff, CC CC

tt ff 13 cc oo v. ii

rr tt

cc

tt ii

ss rr 14 iiDD ttssii MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DD

ss

eett nn 15 Defendant. aa rr / tt ee

SS hh

tt 16 rr

dd

oo

ee NN

tt

iinn ee 17 As the Court explained at the motion hearing, it hereby GRANTS Defendant UU hh

tt

rrooFF 18 MOSAID’s Motion to Transfer this case to the Eastern District of Texas under the first-to-

19 file rule. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: January 4, 2012 CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27

G:\CRBALL\2011\3869\order transferring.wpd

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

ARM Ltd. et al v. Mosaid Technologies, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00008 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_12-cv-00008-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_12-cv-00008-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.