Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

ARM Ltd. et al v. Mosaid Technologies, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00008 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2011)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:12-cv-00008, Dkt. No. 12
Decided
August 26, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for MOSAID Technologies, Inc. to Respond to Amended Complaint. Responsive pleading due by 10/10/11
Length
1 page

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OAKLAND DIVISION

ARM, LTD. AND ARM, INC., )

) CASE NO. 11-CV-3869-DMR

)

Plaintiffs, ) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

) FOR MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INC.

v. ) TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED ) COMPLAINT

) MOSAID Technologies Inc., ) ) )

Defendants. )

)

ORDER ADOPTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR MOSAID

TECHNOLOGIES INC. TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to extend the time for Defendant Mosaid Technologies, Inc. (“Mosaid”) to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs ARM Ltd. and ARM, Inc.’s (collectively, “ARM”) First Amended Complaint. PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. Mosaid’s responsive pleading to ARM’s First Amended Complaint is due on or before October 10, 2011. 8/26/2011 DATED:_____________________ BY:_________________________________________ Hon. Donna Ryu United States Magistrate Judge

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

ARM Ltd. et al v. Mosaid Technologies, Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00008 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_12-cv-00008-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_12-cv-00008-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.