Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC, No. 6:05-cv-00424 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2006)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:05-cv-00424, Dkt. No. 166
Decided
November 29, 2006
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 142 Report and Recommendations. Ordered that Defendant Rapidpay, LLC, and all persons and entities acting in concert with Rapidpay be enjoined from making, using, selling or importing any produc…
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

TYLER DIVISION

ADVANCEME, INC. §

Plaintiff, §

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:05cv424

vs. § § RAPIDPAY, LLC, et al., § §

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The above entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration (Doc. No. 142). The parties did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendations. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37 and 55, that Defendant Rapidpay, LLC, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and all persons and entities acting in concert with Rapidpay, or in participation with Rapidpay, be enjoined from making, using, selling, or offering for sale in the United States, or importing into the United States, any products and/or services that infringe, induce the infringement of, or contributorily infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,941,281 entitled “Automated Payment.”

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of November, 2006.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

LEONARD DAVIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC, No. 6:05-cv-00424 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2006).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-6_05-cv-00424-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-6_05-cv-00424-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.