Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

epicRealm Licensing, LLC v. autoflex Leasing, Inc. et al, No. 5:07-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2006)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:07-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 260
Decided
October 30, 2006
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION; for 194 Report and Recommendations
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

EPICREALM, LICENSING, LLC § § v § No. 2:05CV163 § AUTOFLEX LEASING, INC., et al. § EPICREALM, LICENSING, LLC § § v § No. 2:05CV356 § FRANKLIN COVEY CO., et al. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report and Recommendation Regarding Claim Construction of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. Plaintiff and Defendants both filed objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court conducted a de novo review.

The Court, having reviewed the relevant briefing, finds the parties’ objections are without merit. In their briefing, the parties address, among other things, the word “mechanism” as used in the Magistrate Judge’s discussion of the construction of “Web page.” See Report and Recommendation at pgs. 8-9 (“As described within the2 specification, a Web page is a mechanism through which static and dynamic content may be displayed.”)(emphasis added). A Web page may include static or dynamic content. However, the Magistrate Judge’s construction of “Web page” as “Web content displayable through a Web browser” does not include the word “mechanism.” The Court adopts the construction of “web page” as proposed by the Magistrate Judge, and with the exception of the use of the word “mechanism,” the Court also adopts the reasoning of the Magistrate Judge with respect to the construction of “Web page.”

The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

epicRealm Licensing, LLC v. autoflex Leasing, Inc. et al, No. 5:07-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2006).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-5_07-cv-00125-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-5_07-cv-00125-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.