Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

epicRealm Licensing, LLC v. autoflex Leasing, Inc. et al, No. 5:07-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2005)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division
Case No.
No. 5:07-cv-00125, Dkt. No. 64
Decided
November 16, 2005
Judge
David Folsom, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER that case be consolidated with 2:05cv150 and 2:05cv356. Cases associated.Case referred to Magistrate Judge Craven and set for status conference on 12/14/05 at 10:00 am in Texarkana. Order #61 is VACATED in this case
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

EPICREALM LICENSING, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

v. § 2:05-CV-150-DF §

SPEEDERA NETWORK, INC., § §

Defendant. §

EPICREALM LICENSING, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

v. § 2:05-CV-163-DF §

AUTOFLEX LEASING, INC., et. al., § §

Defendants. §

EPICREALM LICENSING, LLC, §

§

Plaintiff, §

v. § 2:05-CV-356-DF §

FRANKLIN COVEY CO., et. al., § §

Defendants. §

ORDER

On November 2, 2005, Judge T. John Ward entered and Order in Civil Action No. 2:05-CV-163 (Doc. No. 58) wherein the case was consolidated with Civil Action No. 2:05-CV-356 for pretrial purposes pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Thereafter, Judge Ward reassigned both causes of action to this Court because they involve the same patents and similar2 technology as a previously filed action currently pending in this Court – Civil Action No. 2:05-CV-150, which is before Magistrate Caroline Craven for pretrial.

The Court, having reviewed these matters, finds that they involve the same plaintiff alleging infringement of the same patents. Therefore, in order to avoid unnecessary cost and delay, it is hereby ORDERED that Civil Action Nos. 2:05-CV-150, 2:05-CV-163, and 2:05-CV-356 are consolidated pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for pretrial purposes. It is further

ORDERED that, in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) and the local rules for the assignment of duties to United States Magistrate Judges, this consolidated action is referred to the Honorable Caroline M. Craven for pretrial. It is further

ORDERED that this Order shall not prejudice any party’s right to file a motion for separate trials. It is further

ORDERED that the Court’s Order to conduct Rule 26(f) conference in Civil Action No. 2:05-CV-163 (Doc. No. 61) is VACATED. It is further

ORDERED that this consolidated action is hereby scheduled for status conference on Wednesday, December 14, 2005, at 10:00 a.m. in TEXARKANA before Judge Craven. Judge Craven shall notify the Parties regarding the issues to be addressed.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

epicRealm Licensing, LLC v. autoflex Leasing, Inc. et al, No. 5:07-cv-00125 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 16, 2005).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-5_07-cv-00125-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-5_07-cv-00125-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.