U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:11-cv-00660, Dkt. No. 187
Decided
March 27, 2013
Judge
See opinion
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 156 MOTION for Reconsideration re 151 Memorandum & Opinion Objections to the Report and Recommendation on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefini…
Plaintiff, § § V. § CASE NO. 4:11-CV-660 § Judge Schell CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et. al. § Defendants. §
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 11, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered regarding proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based On Indefiniteness (Dkt. 123) be denied (Dkt. 151). The court has made a de novo review of the objections raised by Defendants (see Dkt. 156) and Plaintiff’s response (see Dkt. 161) and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity Based On Indefiniteness (Dkt. 123) is DENIED, and the objections of Defendants are OVERRULED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Net Navigation Systems, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00660 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2013).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.