Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Net Navigation Systems, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00660 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:11-cv-00660, Dkt. No. 186
Decided
March 27, 2013
Judge
See opinion
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
Richard A. Schell on 3/27/13. (cm, )ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 30 Sealed Motion,, filed by Cisco Systems, Inc., 97 Report and Recommendations. The Motion by Defendant Cisco to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a…
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISON

NET NAVIGATION SYSTEMS, LLC §

Plaintiff, § § V. § CASE NO. 4:11-CV-660 § Judge Schell CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., et. al. § Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 24, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered regarding proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the Motion by Defendant Cisco to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. 30) be denied (Dkt. 97). The court has made a de novo review of the objections raised by Defendant (see Dkt. 110) and Plaintiff’s response (see Dkt. 120) and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. The court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this court. Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Motion by Defendant Cisco to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. 30) is DENIED, and the objections of Defendant are

2OVERRULED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Net Navigation Systems, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00660 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_11-cv-00660-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_11-cv-00660-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.