Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. apple Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2013)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:11-cv-00163, Dkt. No. 501
Decided
March 26, 2013
Judge
See opinion
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENYING 310 Sealed Motion, filed by Motorola Mobility Inc, Kyocera Communications, Inc., Apple Inc., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Sony Ericsson Mobile Communicat…
Length
2 pages

**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERMAN DIVISION

IMPERIUM (IP) HOLDINGS, INC, §

§

Plaintiff, § §

v. § Case No. 4:11cv163

§ (Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant)

APPLE INC., ET AL. §

§

Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 26, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’: (1) Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement as to the ‘535 Patent (Dkt. #304); (2) Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement of Claim 15 of the ‘715 Patent (Dkt. #307); (3) Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement of Claims 14 and 17 of the ‘884 Patent (Dkt. #308); (4) Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of All Patents (Dkt. #309); and (5) Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement of Claims 1-6 of the ‘884 Patent (Dkt. #310) be denied.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court.

2It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment on NonInfringement [Docs. # 304, 307, 308, 309, and 310] are DENIED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. apple Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2013).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_11-cv-00163-6
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_11-cv-00163-6

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.