Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. apple Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2012)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:11-cv-00163, Dkt. No. 141
Decided
February 13, 2012
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 103 Motion to Sever
Length
1 page

United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERM AN DIVISION

IMPERIUM (IP) HOLDINGS, INC. § § v. § Case No. 4:11-CV-163

§ Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant

APPLE INC., ET. AL. §

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 20, 2012, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Sever Pursuant to Rules 20 and 21 and to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 103) be denied.

The Court, having made a de novo review of Apple Inc.'s objections, is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Sever Pursuant to Rules 20 and 21 and to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (Dkt. No. 103) is DENIED.

It is SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Imperium (IP) Holdings, Inc. v. apple Inc. et al, No. 4:11-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2012).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_11-cv-00163-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_11-cv-00163-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.