Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Oasis Research, LLC v. adrive, LLC et al, No. 4:10-cv-00435 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2011)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:10-cv-00435, Dkt. No. 245
Decided
July 25, 2011
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Length
2 pages

United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERM AN DIVISION

OASIS RESEARCH, LLC § § v. § Case No. 4:10-CV-435

§ Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant

ADRIVE, LLC, ET. AL. §

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 23, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant GoDaddy.com, Inc.’s Motion for Transfer of Venue to the District of Arizona, or in the Alternative, for Dismissal of Claims Against Go Daddy for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue1 (Dkt. #104) should be denied.

The Court, having made a de novo review of Go Daddy’s objections, as well as Plaintiff’s response to Go Daddy’s objections, is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the objections are without merit. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant GoDaddy.com, Inc.’s Motion for Transfer of2 Venue to the District of Arizona, or in the Alternative, for Dismissal of Claims Against Go Daddy for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue (Dkt. #104) is DENIED.

It is SO ORDERED.

Footnotes

  1. 1 The Court addressed Defendant GoDaddy.com’s transfer of venue argument in conjunction with Go Daddy’s Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder (Dkt. #138). Here, the Court addresses only the personal jurisdiction arguments.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Oasis Research, LLC v. adrive, LLC et al, No. 4:10-cv-00435 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_10-cv-00435-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_10-cv-00435-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.