Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Oasis Research, LLC v. adrive, LLC et al, No. 4:10-cv-00435 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2011)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:10-cv-00435, Dkt. No. 244
Decided
July 25, 2011
Judge
Michael H. Schneider, J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

SHERM AN DIVISION

OASIS RESEARCH, LLC § § v. § Case No. 4:10-CV-435

§ Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant

ADRIVE, LLC, ET. AL. §

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 23, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Carbonite, Inc.’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. #96) should be denied.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Carbonite, Inc.’s Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. #96) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Oasis Research, LLC v. adrive, LLC et al, No. 4:10-cv-00435 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2011).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_10-cv-00435-2
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_10-cv-00435-2

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case