Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

STMicroelectronics Inc v. Sandisk Corporation, No. 4:05-cv-00044 (E.D. Tex. June 23, 2006)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:05-cv-00044
Decided
June 23, 2006
Judge
Document
Order (scanned)
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 193 Report and Recommendations. Ordered that Defendant's Motion to Exclude NEC Controllers from Plaintiff's Damange Base is GRANTED
Length
1 page

<pagelD> FILED

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS United States District Court

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS JUN 2 3 2006

SHERMAN DIVISION

DAVID J. wy Ne. CLERK STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. §

§ DEPUTY

V. § CASE NO. 4:05CV44

§ (Judge Schell/Judge Bush) SANDISK CORPORATION §

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 6, 2006, the Report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing his proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant’s Motion t

    • o Exclude NEC Controllers from Plaintiff's Damage Base be granted.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objection

s thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conc

lusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the same as the findings and co

nclusions of the Court. It is, therefore,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant’s Motion to

Exclude NEC Controllers from Plaintiff’s Damage Base is GRANTED.

SIGNED this 22° day of June, 2006.

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

STMicroelectronics Inc v. Sandisk Corporation, No. 4:05-cv-00044 (E.D. Tex. June 23, 2006).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_05-cv-00044-3
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_05-cv-00044-3

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.