Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

STMicroelectronics Inc v. Sandisk Corporation, No. 4:05-cv-00044 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2005)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:05-cv-00044
Decided
November 10, 2005
Judge
Document
Order (scanned)
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM Adopting Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge. It is Ordered that the Court Adopts the R&R of US Magistrate Judge Don D Bush filed on 10/20/05 a the opinion of the Court. The Court further Adopts the Special Master's Cla…
Length
2 pages

<pagelD>

United States District Court

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

28 UISTINCT Chup EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS i

SHERMAN DIVISION GO NOY 10 py 2:05

reX AS-6 nn 7 STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. § *S-EASTERN

§ BY

V. § CASE NOT#:056N44.___

§ (Judge Schell/Judge Bush) SANDISK CORPORATION §

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 20, 2005, the Report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing his proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the Court adopt the Special Master’s Claims Construction Report and that Special Master Methvin’s findings and conclusions of law become those of the Court.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and having made a de novo review of the objections filed by Defendant thereto, this Court is of the opinion that Defendant’s objections are without merit. The Court therefore finds that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush filed on October 20, 2005 as the opinion of the Court. The Court further ADOPTS the Special Master’s Claims Construction Report, which was attached to the Report and Recommendation as Exhibit A, and ADOPTS

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

2; <pagelD>

Special Master Methvin’s findings and conclusions of law, which, pursuant to this order, constitute the Court’s ruling on the construction of the disputed patent claims in this proceeding, as those of the Court.

SIGNED this 7 mM day of November, 2005.

©c hal fl sd RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

STMicroelectronics Inc v. Sandisk Corporation, No. 4:05-cv-00044 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2005).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-4_05-cv-00044-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-4_05-cv-00044-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.