Defendants Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Yealink Network Technology Co., Ltd. previously filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Concerning . Marking (Dkt. No. 114.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 208), recommending grant of Yealink’s’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Concerning Marking as unopposed. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Concerning Marking (Dkt. No. 114) is GRANTED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of November, 2025.
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
Barco, Inc. et al v. Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00521 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2025).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.