Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Barco, Inc. et al v. Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00521 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00521, Dkt. No. 226
Decided
November 6, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting 209 Report and Recommendations
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

BARCO, INC AND BARCO NV, §

§

Plaintiffs,

§

v. §

§

YEALINK (USA) NETWORK

CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00521-JRG-RSP

§

TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. AND

§

YEALINK NETWORK TECHNOLOGY

§

CO., LTD.,

§

Defendants.

§

ORDER .

Plaintiffs Barco, Inc. and Barco NV previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity (Dkt. No. 110.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 209), recommending denial as moot of Barco’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDE RED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity (Dkt. No. 110) is DENIED AS MOOT.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of November, 2025.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Barco, Inc. et al v. Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00521 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00521-4
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00521-4

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.