Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00379 (E.D. Tex. July 24, 2025)

Denied
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00379, Dkt. No. 348
Decided
July 24, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 334 Sealed Motion
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, §

§ §

Plaintiff,

§ §

v.

. §

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-379-JRG-RSP §

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT

(LEAD CASE)

§

CORP.,

§

§ Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion to Disqualify Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, filed by Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC. Dkt. No. 334. The Motion is hereby DENIED AS MOOT in view of all Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr attorneys having withdrawn from the instant case.1 Dkt. No. 346; Dkt. No. 347.

SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2012.

SIGNED this 24th day of July, 2025.

ROY S. PAYNE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Footnotes

  1. ↩ 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff Motion to Expedite Briefing on the Instant Motion (Dkt. No. 335) is also DENIED AS MOOT.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Headwater Research LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00379 (E.D. Tex. July 24, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00379-9
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00379-9

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case