Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00379 (E.D. Tex. June 23, 2025)

Denied
Discovery
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00379, Dkt. No. 300
Decided
June 23, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J. — Marshall
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER denying 163 Sealed Motion
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC, §

§ §

Plaintiff,

§ §

v.

§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-379-JRG-RSP §

T-MOBILE USA, INC. and SPRINT

(LEAD CASE)

§

CORP.,

§

. § Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion for Sanctions Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e)(1), filed by Defendants T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Sprint Corp.. Dkt. No. 163.

An identical motion was filed in a parallel litigation: Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc., et al, 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP.

For the reasons discussed in the Court’s ruling on the parallel motion, the instant Motion is also DENIED.

SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2012.

SIGNED this 23rd day of June, 2025.

ROY S. PAYNE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Headwater Research LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00379 (E.D. Tex. June 23, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00379-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00379-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case