Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00352 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00352, Dkt. No. 382
Decided
July 9, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ons Inc.. (Motion(s)311, 177 terminated)
Length
2 pages

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

§

HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC,

§

Plaintiff, §

§

v.

§

Case No. 2:23-cv-00352-JRG-RSP VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.,

§

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON

§

WIRELESS, and VERIZON CORPORATE

§

SERVICES GROUP, INC.,

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

Defendants Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,589,541. (Dkt. No. 177.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 311), recommending denial of Verizon’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,589,541. Verizon has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 340) and Headwater has filed its Response (Dkt. No. 373).

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Paten t No. 8,589,541, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Verizon’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was clearly erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVE RRULES Verizon’s Objections, ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,589,541 (Dkt. No. 177) is DENIED.

2.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 9th day of July, 2025.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00352 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00352-15
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00352-15

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.