Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

General access Solutions, Ltd. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00158, Dkt. No. 295
Decided
March 25, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 265 MOTION for New Trial on the Issue of Invalidity of the '477 Patent filed by Ericsson Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Motion(s)265 terminated)
Length
1 page

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

GENERAL ACCESS SOLUTIONS, LTD., §

§

Plaintiff,

§ §

v.

§ § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00158-JRG §

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

§

Defendant, § § § ERICSSON INC., §

§ Intervenor-Defendant. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is the Contingent Rule 59 Motion for New Trial (the “Motion”) filed by . Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc. and Intervenor-Defendant Ericsson Inc. (“Defendants”). (Dkt. No. 265). In the Motion, Defendants move the Court to grant a new trial as to invalidity to the extent this Court grants Plaintiff General Access Solutions, Ltd. (“GAS”)’s Rule 59 Motion for New Trial (Dkt. No. 261) (“GAS’s Motion”). However, the Court has denied GAS’s Motion.

Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion should be and hereby is DENIED AS MOOT.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of March, 2026.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

General access Solutions, Ltd. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00158 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 25, 2026).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00158-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_23-cv-00158-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.