Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00494 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2025)

Granted in Part
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00494, Dkt. No. 259
Decided
March 3, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 239 Report and Recommendations, 125 Sealed Motion filed by LG Electronics USA, Inc., LG Electronics Inc. (Motion(s)125, 239 terminated)
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

§

MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES PTE.

§

LTD.,

§

Plaintiff, §

§ Case No. 2:22-cv-00494-JRG-RSP v.

§

LG ELECTRONICS INC. and LG

§

ELECTRONICS USA, INC.,

§

Defendants. §

ORDER

LG Electronics Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc. previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Direct Infringement. Dkt. No. 125. Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation, recommending grant in part of LG’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Direct Infringement. Dkt. No. 239. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment of No Direct Infringement (Dkt. No. 125) is GRANTED as to the asserted method claims, and otherwise DENIED.

So Ordered this Mar 2, 2025

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00494 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2025).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00494-11
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00494-11

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case