Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00494 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2024)

Granted in Part
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00494, Dkt. No. 65
Decided
March 28, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 61 Report and Recommendations for 24 Motion to Dismiss filed by LG Electronics USA, Inc., LG Electronics Inc
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES PTE. §

LTD., §

§

Plaintiff, §

Case No. 2:22-CV-00494-JRG-RSP §

v. §

§

LG ELECTRONICS INC. and LG § ELECTRONICS USA, INC., §

§

Defendant.

ORDER

LG previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. . No. 24.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 61), recommending grant in part and denial in part of LG’s Motion to Dismiss. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 26) is GRANTED as to products in use prior to the issuance of the asserted patents and otherwise DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of March, 2024.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00494 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2024).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00494-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00494-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case