Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant STA Group LLC previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims for Failure to State a Claim (Dkt. No. 105.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 237), recommending denial of STA’s Motion to Dismiss. Because no objections have been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 105) is DENIED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 28th day of March, 2024.
RODNEY GILSTRAP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.
Analysis is coming soon.
A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by
Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and
everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone,
always.
Cite this opinion
STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00381 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2024).
No reporter citation is shown because the official
source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and
a citator before relying on this form.