Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
E.D. Tex.

STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00381 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2023)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00381, Dkt. No. 117
Decided
August 11, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J. — Marshall
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 87 Report and Recommendations Court OVERRULES Motorolas Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 13) is DENIED
Length
1 page
Download Opinion (PDF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MARSHALL DIVISION

STA GROUP LLC, §

§ Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00381-JRG-RSP § MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., §

§ Defendant. §

ORDER

Defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. (“Motorola”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 13). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 87), recommending denial of Motorola’s Motion to Dismiss. Motorola has now filed Objections (Dkt. No. 103), with Plaintiff STA (“STA”) filing a Response (Dkt. No. 113). .

After conducting a de novo review of the briefing on the Motion to Dismiss, the Report and Recommendation, and the briefing on Motorola’s Objections, the Court agrees with the reasoning provided within the Report and Recommendation and concludes that the Objections fail to show that the Report and Recommendation was erroneous. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES Motorola’s Objections and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 13) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of August, 2023.

RODNEY GILSTRAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00381 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2023).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00381-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-txed-2_22-cv-00381-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case